First Lady of Florida hand signalling in speech

Do you ever watch a video and see someone talking naturally and expressively with their hands and think they couldn't talk without them? I know some people like that. "It's this big!" with arms stretched out. Then there are those who don't use their arms or hands at all. Then there are those that have routine usage patterns with their hands.

Why would someone use different hand gestures in a speech to normal life? It's it nervousness? Is it not knowing what to do or coaching? How do we interpret what seems to be consistent use of hands that seems to constitute a regularity, perhaps even a 'language'.

I've just watch this video with the First Lady of Florida announcing some initiatives. Have a each for a minute, then come back... https://youtu.be/k_Qw860Qccw

Did you notice a few things about her hands?

a) the OWL - first finger and thumb joined on a loop and remaining fingers splayed

b) the TRIANGLE

Did you notice these gestures were employed at moments of impact, when she's starting an announcement?

These are Illuminati hand signals.

I know Florida is very proud of their culture, their society and a degree of independence, but this speech sadly makes me suspect there are influences at the top in politics that have connections in the NWO. Time will doubtless tell, but I also suspect given she's talking about opiate overuse and mental health that you'd have to look at things case by case to really know what goes on in this area.

So we're talking drug abuse and mental health, and she says they are linked. She's mentions opiates.  The 'opiod crisis' through legitimate health care is being blown out of proportion as far as social impact is concerned; for many there is no real alternative, and until Ketamine treatment is widely available to help significantly reduce nervous system sensitivity. In my opinion, it's being used to create social tension.

There are massive numbers of children go missing in the USA each year, and many are alienated from their families and involved in state care. The issue is largely buried. Now we're facing the state asking children to report their parents for various matters - there is an element of that in this speech too.

Lastly, we're talking about leaving people in the community as much as possible because the Bad Guys belong in jail. Isn't much of the penal system meant to be about rehabilitation? Mind you, the USA has the largest incarcination rate in the world. It's overloaded. Of course the new President, Joe Biden, is talking about significant releases of criminals into the community. That's a worry if they are not rehabilitated.

Will we see then any evidence of whether the First Lady was signalling? Possibly not on this occasion. I would however be watching her and her husband very closely as they make speeches, for consistent use of Illuminati hand signals indicates a definite agenda that is not in the people's interest, no matter how popular their stylists, speech writers and the media make them.

OH MY GOODNESS, DID YOU SEE THE WASTE?

Have you ever heard of such waste, complicity and lack of backbone to recover endless million of dollars? The general concerned of course now works with the contractor that wasn't persecuted. The 'assets' lost 99.9 percent of their value, being sold as SCRAP METAL!

We as Australians must hold our politicians and government agencies accountable for screw-ups like this. Sometimes they are not screw-ups, but rather they are a get rich quick scams run by people who are confident they will never be prosecuted. 

I live in Victoria, Australia. There is no way we Aussies should let our money go into such a pit (or tunnel for a bit of local context) as this without pressing as many buttons as possible to get transparency and accountability happening.

http://www.ronpaulinstitute.org/archives/featured-articles/2021/march/06/behold-your-afghan-air-fleet-how-us-paid-549-million-for-defective-cargo-planes-and-then-sold-them-for-40-257-of-scrap-metal/

Pfizer bullies countries for assets to secure vaccine

“Pfizer misbehaved with Argentina. Its intolerance with us was tremendous” – Ginés González Garcia, former minister of health"

It seems there are multiple reports of Pfizer bullying countries into ceding military bases, federal reserve resources and sovereign assets in order to secure their vaccine.

Having looked for veracity of these claims, I have found the most cited resource to be https://www.thebureauinvestigates.com/stories/2021-02-23/held-to-ransom-pfizer-demands-governments-gamble-with-state-assets-to-secure-vaccine-deal.

The Australian National Review chief an Indian report on this matter: https://australiannationalreview.com/health/gravitas-pfizers-abusive-vaccine-deals/

Here's the report Brighteon, an uncensored social media platform: on https://www.brighteon.com/bb93781a-990e-4d81-9d90-dc056d4829b9.

Given the background of most chemical and many vaccine companies, is not surprising to find this kind of behaviour occurring. Pfizer want power. The big question is who will weild this power from behind the scenes? If the power has been coerced, the intent surely cannot be good. 

So my parting questions are:

1. Who is behind Pfizer?

2. Why the lust for power and resources?

3. What will these be used for?

4. What is the underlying agenda?

There's too much history with companies like Pfizer not to think there an agenda. Time will tell. As for me, I'm not anti-vax, but I won't trust them in general.

Surprised? A Jesuit panel sees ‘Tremendous Overlap’ Between Joe Biden and Vatican

Back in December, I read an recent article on Brietbart by THOMAS D. WILLIAMS, PH.D.. I'm not sure I've ever copied an article in its entirety to comment on it, but there was so much in this one I've been sorely tempted.

Let me draw the cast of parties for you first:

Jesuit-run Georgetown University 

Vatican

Pope Francis

Shaun Casey

Joe Biden

China

Trump

United Nations

European Union

So let's start:

Panelists at Jesuit-run Georgetown University... converged ... in the common belief that a Biden administration will see eye-to-eye on many issues with the Vatican of Pope Francis.

“There’s great opportunity for overlap there,” said the director of Georgetown’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs “And I really do think the Vatican wants to get down to business and I am confident that our new president-to-be — the Roman Catholic Joe Biden — is eager to find ways to collaborate together.”

“There’s reason for great hope and great progress here despite the fact that he is a pro-life [sic] Catholic,” Mr. Casey said in reference to Biden with an evident slip of the tongue. “That will never be transcended in the relationship. It’s just a fact and there’s going to be noise and there will be implications of that over the length of Biden’s term.”

“However, when you look at the foreign policy priorities of the impending American administration, and that of the papacy of Francis, there is a tremendous overlap between their priorities,” he said, enumerating “climate change, rebuilding global refugee resettlement networks, seeking Middle East peace, combatting anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, confronting global populist movements all around the planet, and reducing nuclear arms.”

Casey also praised the Vatican for its controversial 2018 agreement with China on the naming of bishops, pointing to it as an example of successful diplomacy that the United States could learn from.

“Whatever that agreement contains or doesn’t contain, the Vatican diplomatic corps are really one of the few among the 200 or so sovereign states that can say they have been in modestly successful long-term negotiations with the Chinese,” he said.

Casey also said that U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had missed an opportunity by criticizing the deal.

“If I were secretary of state, I would have said, ‘I know you can’t tell us the details, we don’t want to know the details, but can you give us any clues, any hints, any insights in how to engage China on a diplomatic basis?’”

“The Trump administration’s diplomacy with China is a mess,” Casey said. “We have receded in the last four years and they seem to be clueless and here you have a sovereign state, tiny though it may be, that actually has some defensible success in engaging them.”

“They’ve done what nobody else seems to be able to do,” he said.

Journalist Josh McElwee, Vatican correspondent for the progressive National Catholic Reporter, substantially agreed with Casey, suggesting that there will be significantly greater understanding between the Vatican and the U.S. under a Biden presidency.

“I think going forward, this could be an area where we see a big difference between Trump and Biden’s engagement with the Vatican,” McElwee said. “Biden’s future ambassador will be able to speak more to the pope’s core diplomatic concerns, things like climate change, strengthening international institutions like the U.N. or the E.U., the continuing migration crisis, arms control, and other issues.”

“I think for Catholics the wild card might be the U.S. bishops’ conference,” McElwee cautioned. “There is a small minority of U.S. bishops who have been increasingly open about being critical about Pope Francis and they may protest if the Vatican is working too closely with the Biden administration or isn’t critiquing Biden on his stance on legalized abortion.”

Jesuit Father Drew Christiansen, Georgetown professor of ethics and human development, also praised the pope’s diplomatic relations with China.

One thing that makes China open to Francis is that “the Catholic Church understands that they are a distinctive culture and has honored that,” Father Christiansen said. “I think a great respect for the culture is a way to build up the relationship.”

Just last week, Pope Francis chose Joe Biden’s slogan “build back better” to describe his vision for the great reset after the coronavirus pandemic, saying he finds the expression “quite striking.”

6 Dec 2020269

4:10

Panelists at Jesuit-run Georgetown University converged Friday in the common belief that a Biden administration will see eye-to-eye on many issues with the Vatican of Pope Francis.

“There’s great opportunity for overlap there,” said the director of Georgetown’s Berkley Center for Religion, Peace and World Affairs, Shaun Casey, in an online webinar, “And I really do think the Vatican wants to get down to business and I am confident that our new president-to-be — the Roman Catholic Joe Biden — is eager to find ways to collaborate together.”

“There’s reason for great hope and great progress here despite the fact that he is a pro-life [sic] Catholic,” Mr. Casey said in reference to Biden with an evident slip of the tongue. “That will never be transcended in the relationship. It’s just a fact and there’s going to be noise and there will be implications of that over the length of Biden’s term.”

“However, when you look at the foreign policy priorities of the impending American administration, and that of the papacy of Francis, there is a tremendous overlap between their priorities,” he said, enumerating “climate change, rebuilding global refugee resettlement networks, seeking Middle East peace, combatting anti-Semitism and Islamophobia, confronting global populist movements all around the planet, and reducing nuclear arms.”

Casey also praised the Vatican for its controversial 2018 agreement with China on the naming of bishops, pointing to it as an example of successful diplomacy that the United States could learn from.

“Whatever that agreement contains or doesn’t contain, the Vatican diplomatic corps are really one of the few among the 200 or so sovereign states that can say they have been in modestly successful long-term negotiations with the Chinese,” he said.

Casey also said that U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo had missed an opportunity by criticizing the deal.

“If I were secretary of state, I would have said, ‘I know you can’t tell us the details, we don’t want to know the details, but can you give us any clues, any hints, any insights in how to engage China on a diplomatic basis?’”

“The Trump administration’s diplomacy with China is a mess,” Casey said. “We have receded in the last four years and they seem to be clueless and here you have a sovereign state, tiny though it may be, that actually has some defensible success in engaging them.”

“They’ve done what nobody else seems to be able to do,” he said.

Journalist Josh McElwee, Vatican correspondent for the progressive National Catholic Reporter, substantially agreed with Casey, suggesting that there will be significantly greater understanding between the Vatican and the U.S. under a Biden presidency.

“I think going forward, this could be an area where we see a big difference between Trump and Biden’s engagement with the Vatican,” McElwee said. “Biden’s future ambassador will be able to speak more to the pope’s core diplomatic concerns, things like climate change, strengthening international institutions like the U.N. or the E.U., the continuing migration crisis, arms control, and other issues.”

“I think for Catholics the wild card might be the U.S. bishops’ conference,” McElwee cautioned. “There is a small minority of U.S. bishops who have been increasingly open about being critical about Pope Francis and they may protest if the Vatican is working too closely with the Biden administration or isn’t critiquing Biden on his stance on legalized abortion.”

Jesuit Father Drew Christiansen, Georgetown professor of ethics and human development, also praised the pope’s diplomatic relations with China.

One thing that makes China open to Francis is that “the Catholic Church understands that they are a distinctive culture and has honored that,” Father Christiansen said. “I think a great respect for the culture is a way to build up the relationship.”

Just last week, Pope Francis chose Joe Biden’s slogan “build back better” to describe his vision for the great reset after the coronavirus pandemic, saying he finds the expression “quite striking.”

source article: https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2020/12/06/georgetown-panel-sees-tremendous-overlap-between-biden-vatican/

Executive Order > Bloodbath > NWO

An Executive Order has been passed which is very interesting. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-imposing-certain-sanctions-event-foreign-interference-united-states-election. Trump passed it in September regarding interference in the election. He has apparently already pulled the supreme courts of some states, overturning them and putting some of his legal people in place (according to Ambassador William Mount), so those who committed treason have nowhere to hide. 

All governors and state supreme judges are licenced from the District of Columbia, which is why he's been able to do this. The US has been running under Canon or Martine Law since it went bankrupt in 1933. I'm not totally sure how that fits in with the third incarnation of the Federal Reserve System in 1913, bit I suspect they got control of the money supply in 1913 and the government in 1933.

See the video on BitChute channel about what's happening in the US regarding Trump, evidence of election fraud and how he's dealing with it at https://www.bitchute.com/video/U3DbGcmntoBB/.

This does not mean I'm keen on Trump. It just reveals what's coming. It will probably produce a violent response. I suspect it's being left until expectations are well and truly established that the Dems have won; maximizing the response.

The whole thing is a Hegelian Dialectic. The thesis is Dems winning. The antithesis is Trump then announced to win. The result could be a blood bath, with the synthesis moving the US further into lockdowns and martial law.

Justin Martyr on giving

As it turns out, I've already read some of a book a friend recently lent me. It's an old book, by William Marrion Branham. Some will run a mile when they hear that name, but I'm not ready to throw the baby out with the bathwater, in particular when he cites Justin Martyr, a second century saint.

So here's an excerpt from page forty seven. The emphasis is mine.

"Let me make one more note about the Saturdarians who claim that we meet on the wrong day of the week when we meet on Sunday, the first day. Here is what Justin said in the second century.

"On Sunday a meeting is held of all who live in cities and villages, and a section is read of the memoirs of the apostles and the writings as long as time permits. When the reading is finished, the president in a discourse gives the admonition and exhortation to imitate those noble things. After this we all arise to offer common prayer. At the close of the prayer, as we have described, bread and wine are placed before us, and thanksgiving made and the congregation answers, "Amen".

Then the elements are distributed to each one and are partaken of and carried by the deacons to the house of the absent.

The wealthy and willing then give contributions according to their free will and this collection is deposited with the president who therewith supplies orphans, widows, prisoners, strangers in want."

Thus we see that those who claim the early church carried on the Judaic tradition of assembling on the last day of the week are grossly ignorant of what history actually sets forth..."

I think the bold text speaks for itself. This is not the first time I've seen historical evidence that giving was as people were able, and distributed to the needy.

Ref: https://www.biblebelievers.org.au/7ch004.htm#IN%20THE%20SPIRIT%20ON%20THE%20LORD'S%20DAY.

It is nice to hear real teaching

The family are in need. I'm up again with YHWH's gift of pain. I say that because, although it's punished me pretty badly the past sixteen years and I haven't always copied well, it's also driven me into His arms, given me time awake in the middle of they night to ponder and to read, and time to pray.

In this case, I started off questioning the meaning and appropriateness of the lyrics in TobyMac's "Funky Jesus Music" where it talks about "gimme that juicy flow". It had been in my mind a bit. Needless to say the phrase has sexualities connotations in many references, and yoga connotations in other situations. Despite much reading, I never found a Christian reference.

But I did find this blog. Three page with these sermons seems to cover good subject matter; much needed when more sermons than not just 'tickle the ears' of the hearer!

https://www.realtruthmatters.com/2018/10/22/must-hear-sermons/