China help Russia in Syria

It's this one reason why the NWO mouthpiece Hillary Clinton is pushing for a no-fly zone in Syria, which Russia has bluntly said will leave them with no option but war? Does Clinton want war to erupt there before the Chinese can reinforce the Syrian Government? We hear nothing of this in the western press! Watch this video and consider these questions. https://youtu.be/hdiAmQ-tOTw

USA at first base with Trump

It looks like a done deal. Trump is in. Let's hope he'll do what he says he will. Watch Obama now. The next 3 months or so are crucial. He may yet move to pardon some very shady people. He may try and push some things through that are detrimental.

Nigel Farage says this is parallel to what happened in the UK: the citizens have woken up. They don't want warmongers and criminals running government. They don't want the country sold out to globalists and international bankers via the TPP, TAA and other supra-national treaties, and they don't want to answer to supra-national, unelected bodies that don't have the country's interests at heart. Also, they don't necessarily want to buy from overseas what they can grow or build themselves.

If the USA can get the globalists out of their hair and regain some sovereignty and productivity; if they can avoid wars like Clinton was ready to drag them into with Russia (just Google it) they may have a good enough run that they can be a blessing instead of a curse to other countries in the world.

The USA just got to first base. Now they need to 'drain the swamp'. Trump should talk to Putin, who has paid off Russia's debts to global bankers and asked them to leave Russia. Russia has taken a hammering for it, but at least they are free as a nation now to rebuild themselves. Putin recognises the real enemy, and it's not the USA. Let's hope Trump sees as clearly.

If Hilary loses - blame the Russians and nullify the result?

https://youtu.be/WaWDZOhRftc

To WAR or not WAR? A burning election question for USA.

There's been a lot of noise in the USA about Russia lately. Hillary Clinton has been doing some real hard talk about retribution for Russia hacking the DNC and being subversive in the Middle East; particularly Syria. It's amazing how despite whistleblowers coming out one after the other, the USA government machine and NWO owned media seem able to bend the perspectives of the average American.

The referenced article quotes one of the early whistleblowers from inside the 'intelligence' establishment, saying the hacks to the Democratic National Congress servers were from inside the US intelligence community, not from Russia.

Sitting here in the comfort of country Victoria, Australia, I can only hope that the NWO/UN/Clinton camp gets derailed before they manage to drag the USA into a major war and finish the selling off of USA sovereignty to the UN & globalists. I have thought for years that Iraq may be the first country in the world effectively run by the UN, but recent events in the US such as masses of UN heavy vehicles coming in and suggestion the UN will have to supervise elections and maybe keep peace have got me wondering whether the USA might get there first.

"But that leaves them with Trump!" I hear you bemoan. Yeah, it may not seem a good alternative, but at least Trump is not ready to use the USA to ignite a global conflict. It's Hillary & Bill, the Bush family, Cheney and friends that make immense fortunes from war. Despite Trump's failings, there seems to be no personal incentive for him to either further sell off the USA or drag them into war.

Let's see now. How should I vote? War or no war?

www.usasupreme.com/nsa-whistleblower-says-dnc-hack-not-done-russia-u-s-intelligence

A new financial crisis is 'certain' without reform of banks

A real expert, former governor of the Bank of England, no less, is saying we are in for another financial crisis. Why? Because there's been no reform in banking, and the same practices have now placed us in deeper jeopardy.

Some are calling for a form of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 (USA) to be effected everywhere as protection for property owners. Glass-Steagall basically separated commercial and investment banking. Here's something on that act : https://berniesanders.com/yes-glass-steagall-matters-here-are-5-reasons-why/. Moreover, if Bernie Sanders has made it a big point of argument with Hillary Clinton, it has to be important.

So if Glass-Steagall was implemented in 1933 for protection of property owners, why did the GFC crash of 2008 hit the USA so badly? Because the act was repealed in 1999. And as soon as it was repealed the banks started venturing into the territory it had banned. It has been argued widely whether the removal of this safe guard was responsible for the 2000/2001 crash and the 2008 GFC. Lots of people make lots of noises, and there are vested interests involved and people that would prefer not to go to jail! Looking back tends to being those kind of tensions into play.

Looking forward, it's interesting to see some very prominent people arguing for implementing of Glass-Steagall type legislation very soon to minimize chances of another crash ; and certainly to try and straighten up the juggernaut that seems bound for one right now.

Mervyn King, former Governor of the Bank of England, is one that has started before it's necessary; and he's now soften a book starting it's really important. See https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/feb/28/mervyn-king-new-financial-crisis-is-certain-without-reform-of-banks.

Looking at Australia, it's interesting that we often throw out the baby with the bathwater when someone looks or sounds a bit different. All it takes is the mainstream media (obedient to their masters) to cast doubt on someone, and we relegate them to the Crazy Basket. Such is the fate of Lyndon LaRouche, who had repeatedly argued the vital importance of 'physical economy'; ignoring inflationary or speculative prices, and implementation of Glass-Steagall. He's been called a nutter and a dinosaur many times. But he's been right an awful lot. Such also is the fate of the CEC (Citizens' Electoral Council) in Australia, who adhere to much of LaRouche's teachings. Craig Isherwood, leader and front man of the CEC, may not be the smooth tongued Barack Obama of Australia, but he has presented LaRouche's arguments and some of the CEC's own ideas reasonably effectively. He is of course, much maligned my the press and the incumbent political establishment.

I hadn't looked at a CEC video for some time. I happened to do so today. It's the 3rd March 2016 report. You can find it on YouTube: https://youtu.be/tuZR5iRJTHs. They were talking about Glass-Steagall and the housing bubble, which is partly due to the Chinese Government's massive investment in Australian property.

If you've heard of CEC and been told they are incompetent, lunatics or anything else defamatory, maybe it's time to look again. They may not be right about everything, but they have been playing from the same songbook for a long time now, and some very senior banking figures are starting to say the same things. Even their long-stated vision for a high velocity train sounds more plausible given Tesla & Elon Musk's progress overseas.

No matter what you think of the CEC's ideas in totality, if you want your kids to own a home ; of even if you want to be more certain you can own your home; and that the average Aussie won't be robbed of theirs, the CEC is perhaps a voice that should be aired now in Australian politics. Particularly when none else is floating a few of the very important matters that are part of their platform.

Is be pleased to receive comments on this post, and I'll give my readers the benefit of the doubt that they are capable of expressing themselves appropriately, without rudeness or malice, and with a degree of respect and intelligence.

Robbert Kiyosaki 2016 predictions complete with Illuminati HAND SIGNALS

How do we endorse someone online? What if it's a video we want to share and we'd like people to pay attention. Short of paid advertising, we generally rely on word of mouth, and this generally happens through interest groups, work or social structures.

So if I'm introducing a video and I think I'd like a specific segment of society to pay attention, I could use a buzzword or gesture with which they identify to get that attention. For Australian (maybe vanilla US influenced international) youth, I might wear a baseball cap on backwards, say "What's up?" and stand a certain way, maybe even folding my arms in a defiant stance.

If I'm a member of a more secretive club, I might even have less known gestures or hand signals.

In this case, the lady introducing Robert Kiyosaki is doing the usual hand waving and gesturing we expect of presenters for emphasis, but her hands occasionally lapse info a very deliberate sign using the thumbs and forefingers. It's like a diamond, and that's what I've got a snapshot of here.

You can look through the entire presentation at https://youtu.be/M-XIMtd8ilM. Watch for the hand signals.

Stay watching the news and current affairs programs more carefully, looking for deliberate, repeated gestures. Don't write odd gestures off ; they are quite likely deliberate communication to others who are initiates of the secret society!

I'm closing, I've seen an escalation of these kind of signals over the past five to ten years. The Illuminists are getting emboldened as their plan to bring about a New World Order comes to fruition. They are very powerful, very determined, and very likely to create yet more havoc in the financial and political systems some time in the next decade, but more likely the next couple of years given current events.

Watch for a world wide monetary system, world government and a  unified world religion. When you see these things happening, reach for a bible quick smart.